Jane vs Hunhu: Which Platform Is Right for Your Agency or Clinic?
Jane App is a clinical practice management platform designed for multi-disciplinary clinics. It handles scheduling, notes, billing, and telehealth for employed or contracted practitioners. Hunhu is a white-label directory platform for agencies and organizations that manage an external provider network and need to publish, book, and earn from that network. They are built for different organizational structures.
Jane App at a Glance
Jane is a practice management platform built for multi-disciplinary health clinics. It is particularly popular with physiotherapy clinics, chiropractic offices, mental health practices, massage therapy centers, and occupational therapy organizations. Jane handles scheduling, clinical documentation, insurance billing, online booking, and telehealth in one platform.
Pricing: Jane pricing is per practitioner. Plans start around $74 CAD/month for one practitioner and scale with each additional seat. There is no flat organizational tier.
Best for: Clinics with employed or contracted practitioners who all work within the same organization and need a unified clinical workflow tool.
Where Jane Falls Short for Network-Based Agencies
Jane was designed for the traditional clinic model: you hire practitioners, they work in your space, and you manage their clinical workflow centrally. When organizations operate a network of external or independent providers, Jane's model creates friction:
- Per-practitioner pricing scales against you. Jane charges per seat. An agency network with 50 external providers would pay Jane's per-practitioner rate for 50 seats even if those providers are independent and manage their own clinical records elsewhere.
- No white-label public directory. Jane's Attract feature surfaces practitioners on Jane's own discovery layer, not on your organization's branded domain. You cannot run a public, white-labeled provider directory on your website using Jane.
- No agency-level commission model. Jane does not provide tools for the organization to earn a percentage of sessions booked through its network. Revenue goes to the practitioner, not to the organization as a platform operator.
- Designed for internal staff, not external networks. Jane assumes the practitioners are employees or contractors working under your clinical governance. Independent providers in an external referral network have their own records systems and do not want a second clinical login.
- No organizational client intake. Client matching and intake in Jane is practitioner-centric. There is no centralized intake flow that routes clients to the right provider across your full network.
How Hunhu Approaches It Differently
Hunhu is built for the agency or organization that sits above the provider, not for the provider's own clinical workflow. If your organization manages a network of providers who are not your employees, Hunhu is the layer that makes that network visible, bookable, and monetizable:
- Per-organization pricing. Whether your network has 10 providers or 100, Hunhu's pricing is organizational. Each new provider you add to the network does not add another seat cost.
- Fully white-labeled directory. Your directory lives on your domain, with your brand, and is fully embeddable on your existing website. Clients search your network without leaving your site.
- Commission management built in. Set a commission rate and Hunhu tracks earnings per provider per session. Organizations earn revenue from the network they built.
- Providers manage their own profiles. Independent providers in your network set their own availability, manage their own profile, and run their own clinical records in whatever system they already use. Hunhu is the directory and intake layer, not a replacement for their clinical tools.
- Organizational client intake. Clients enter through your branded intake flow, get matched to the right provider, and book directly. Your organization manages the intake, not individual providers.
Feature Comparison Table
| Feature | Jane App | Hunhu |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical Notes / SOAP Documentation | Yes | -- |
| Insurance Billing | Yes | -- |
| Telehealth | Yes | -- |
| Multi-Disciplinary Clinic Scheduling | Yes | -- |
| White-Label Provider Directory | -- | Yes |
| Embeddable Directory Widget | -- | Yes |
| External / Independent Provider Networks | -- | Yes |
| Agency-Level Client Intake | -- | Yes |
| Commission / Revenue Sharing | -- | Yes |
| Pricing Model | Per practitioner | Per organization |
| SEO-Optimized Provider Profiles | Limited | Yes |
| Provider Self-Onboarding | Limited | Yes |
When Jane Makes Sense
Jane is a strong choice when:
- You operate a multi-disciplinary clinic with employed or contracted practitioners under your clinical governance.
- Your primary need is a unified scheduling, notes, and billing platform for your internal team.
- Your practitioners work primarily in person or via telehealth within your clinic structure.
- You do not need a public-facing, white-labeled directory for an external provider network.
When Hunhu Makes Sense
Hunhu is the right fit when:
- Your organization manages a network of external or independent providers, not just employed practitioners.
- You need a public-facing, branded directory that clients can search and book from on your domain.
- You want to earn commission on sessions booked through your network, not just facilitate the booking.
- Your providers already have their own clinical systems and do not need (or want) a second clinical login through your organization.
- You are running a referral network, a provider alliance, or a multi-agency directory rather than a traditional single-location clinic.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I use Jane and Hunhu together?
Yes. Jane handles clinical scheduling, notes, and billing for your internal practitioners. Hunhu handles the public-facing directory and intake for your external provider network. Organizations that manage both employed staff and an external referral network often run Jane for internal use and Hunhu for the external directory.
Does Jane offer a white-label directory?
Jane does not offer a white-label provider directory. Jane's Attract feature surfaces practitioners on Jane's own platform, but your organization cannot run a branded, embeddable provider directory on your own domain using Jane.
What is Jane App best used for?
Jane App is best used for clinics managing a team of employed or contracted practitioners who all work within the same organization. It handles their scheduling, clinical notes, online booking, telehealth, and billing under one roof.
How much does Jane cost for a multi-practitioner clinic?
Jane pricing scales per practitioner. Plans start around $74 CAD/month for a single practitioner and increase with each additional practitioner added. For a network of 30 providers, Jane's per-seat pricing can become a significant monthly line item.
Can Hunhu replace Jane for clinical notes and billing?
No. Hunhu is not a clinical management system. It does not handle clinical notes, SOAP notes, insurance billing, or telehealth. Hunhu is the directory and intake layer: it manages the public provider listing, client matching, booking, and commission on sessions. Your practitioners can continue using Jane for their clinical workflow.
Who uses Hunhu instead of Jane?
Agencies and organizations that manage a network of external providers rather than employed practitioners. If your organization refers clients to providers who are not your employees, or if you run a multi-agency provider pool, Hunhu's model fits better than Jane's per-practitioner clinical tool.
See how Hunhu works for provider networks
Launch a white-label directory for your provider network. Manage intake, commissions, and bookings at the organizational level.
Related: All comparisons · vs SimplePractice · vs Carepatron · White-label directory guide